SOMAVAC® 100

Sustained Vacuum

Intended for the removal of surgical and bodily fluids and exudate from a closed wound following plastic and other general surgery forming large flaps for hematoma and seroma prophylaxis. It is intended for both home-care and healthcare environments.

 Patent Pending

Patent Pending


SOMOVAC-09-11-18-1216 - Pump in Belt - rev 1.jpg

Primary Specifications

  • Consolidates 2 drains in one device

  • Battery operated (2-AA)

  • Sustained vacuum for up to 6 weeks

  • Single patient use

  • Approx 350 grams

  • Comes with disposable, graduated, multi-channel collection units

  • Light and sound indicators


Combatting Seroma

It has been shown in literature that

  • Continuous suction effectively removes fluid from the wound site. *

  • With fluid removal, infectious materials and harmful pro-inflammatory mediators found in seromas are less likely to remain in the region.(5)

*data on file


SOMAVAC® 100 is the only suction device available in the US indicated for seroma and hematoma prophylaxis.


  • SOMAVAC® 100 Sustained Vacuum Device has three mechanisms to prevent back flow into the wound.

  • With one touch disposable fluid collection unit, patients are much less likely to open the distal end of the drains to the environment.


 Photo by BrianAJackson/iStock / Getty Images

Higher clinical office efficiency

With our easy-to-use SOMAVAC® 100 Sustained Vacuum Device, you may experience:

  • fewer calls about drains

  • a more productive staff

  • a more efficient clinic with fewer unplanned visits

Pre-Order Today!

We are now accepting pre-orders for our SOMAVAC® 100 Sustained Vacuum Device. Please contact us through the form below.

Name *
Name
Address *
Address
Phone *
Phone

Our Office

4717 Spottswood Avenue
Memphis, TN, 38117
United States

901-654-6370

References

  1. Palaia, David A., et al. "Incidence of seromas and infections using fenestrated versus nonfenestrated acellular dermal matrix in breast reconstructions." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open 3.11 (2015).

  2. Wade, Alex, et al. "Predictors of outpatient resource utilization following ventral and incisional hernia repair." Surgical endoscopy 32.4 (2018): 1695-1700.

  3. Shahan, Charles P., et al. "Sutureless onlay hernia repair: a review of 97 patients." Surgical endoscopy 30.8 (2016): 3256-3261.

  4. Phillips, Brett T., et al. "Current practice among plastic surgeons of antibiotic prophylaxis and closed-suction drains in breast reconstruction: experience, evidence, and implications for postoperative care." Annals of plastic surgery 66.5 (2011): 460-465.

  5. Alexander, J. Wesley, Joel Korelitz, and Nancy S. Alexander. "Prevention of wound infections: a case for closed suction drainage to remove wound fluids deficient in opsonic proteins." The American Journal of Surgery 132.1 (1976): 59-63.

Relevant Publications

The bulb of the closed suction drains are not capable of providing continuous suction.

  • Carruthers, Katherine H., et al. "Optimizing the closed suction surgical drainage system." Plastic Surgical Nursing 33.1 (2013): 38-42. (NCBI)

  • Khansa, Ibrahim, et al. "Optimal Use of Surgical Drains: Evidence-Based Strategies." Plastic and reconstructive surgery 141.6 (2018): 1542-1549. (NCBI)

  • Whitson, Bryan A., et al. "Not Every Bulb Is a Rose: A Functional Comparison of Bulb Suction Devices1." Journal of Surgical Research 156.2 (2009): 270-273.


Incidence of seroma remains high in a variety of surgeries that result in flap or dead space formation. Removal of fluid and tissue apposition are thought to minimize problematic seromas.

  • Janis, Jeffrey E., Lara Khansa, and Ibrahim Khansa. "Strategies for postoperative seroma prevention: a systematic review." Plastic and reconstructive surgery 138.1 (2016): 240-252. (NCBI)

  • Di Martino, Marcello, et al. "Natural evolution of seroma in abdominoplasty." Plastic and reconstructive surgery 135.4 (2015): 691e-698e. (NCBI)

  • Srivastava, Vivek, Somprakas Basu, and Vijay Kumar Shukla. "Seroma formation after breast cancer surgery: what we have learned in the last two decades." Journal of breast cancer 15.4 (2012): 373-380. (NCBI)


Continuous suction has been shown to reduce seroma and its complications.

  • Shin, Seung Jun, et al. "Continuous High-Pressure Negative Suction Drain: New Powerful Tool for Closed Wound Management Clinical Experience." Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 25.4 (2014): 1427-1431.

  • Somers, Robert G., et al. "The use of closed suction drainage after lumpectomy and axillary node dissection for breast cancer. A prospective randomized trial." Annals of surgery215.2 (1992): 146. (NCBI)

  • Morris, A. M. "A controlled trial of closed wound suction drainage in radical mastectomy." British Journal of Surgery60.5 (1973): 357-359.


Patients with seromas are at a higher risk of deep wound infections. Continuous suction preventing retrograde bacterial migration has been documented to minimize the risk of infections.

  • Palaia, David A., et al. "Incidence of seromas and infections using fenestrated versus nonfenestrated acellular dermal matrix in breast reconstructions." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open 3.11 (2015).

  • Raves, John J., Malcolm Slifkin, and Daniel L. Diamond. "A bacteriologic study comparing closed suction and simple conduit drainage." The American journal of surgery 148.5 (1984): 618-620.

  • Nora, Paul F., Robert M. Vanecko, and James J. Bransfield. "Prophylactic abdominal drains." Archives of Surgery 105.2 (1972): 173-176.


Other useful publications:

  • Meyerson, Joseph M. "A brief history of two common surgical drains." Annals of plastic surgery 77.1 (2016): 4-5.

    *data on file

MKG-0004 11/18 Rev. B